The EU debt taken on under Ursula von der Leyen is more expensive to service than originally planned.
75% confidence
EconomyEuropean Union
Omissions
The higher servicing cost is driven mainly by the ECB's rate cycle after 2022, not by a change in the terms negotiated in 2020; the claim is correct as a statement about cost versus plan but should not by itself be read as evidence of mismanagement.
The most precise quantification found (Bruegel: interest cost 'could be twice as high as what was' originally planned) dates from June 2023 and is therefore more than two years older than the session date; it is an estimate, not an outturn.
The European Parliament research briefing figure (€28 billion of NGEU grant-related interest over the 2021-2027 MFF, 'significantly above' the original allocation) was not verified against the underlying Commission budget documents in this check, and no direct ECA/Eurostat primary table comparing planned versus actual interest was retrieved.
Reporting based on the European Court of Auditors' 2025 annual report (EU debt up more than 20% to €738.9 billion, on track for €1 trillion by 2027) appears in outlets dated around October 2026, i.e. at or very close to the session date; the MEP may not have had that specific report available.
Sources
SecondaryBruegel — 'The rising cost of European Union borrowing and what to do about it' (Policy Brief 12/2023)"Our estimates suggest that, because of the high current and expected levels of interest rates, this cost could be twice as high as what was" [originally planned]; the brief also states that "given the much higher interest costs than initially planned, the EU should quickly review how interest costs are accounted for".